On Rationaity of Love

Published on November 23, 2023by Le Mai Tan Dat

Is Love irrational?

Scenario A: Arthur is a close friend to Ben. One day, Arthur told Ben that he loved a girl named Crimson. Ben did not say much and congratulated Arthur on falling in love. Many months later, Arthur was sad and he told Ben that he did everything he could and for Crimson eagerly showed his love to Crimson but she did not reciprocate his love. Ben advised Arthur against pursuing his love and told him to look at it rationally. A year later, Arthur and Crimson broke up and Arthur regretted wasting his time and effort for pursuing Crimson.

Scenario B: Arthur is a close friend to Ben. One day, Arthur told Ben that he loved a girl named Crimson. Ben did not say much and congratulated Arthur on falling in love. Many months later, Arthur was sad and he told Ben that he did everything he could and for Crimson eagerly showed his love to Crimson but she did not reciprocate his love. Ben advised Arthur against giving up on his love and told him that one day she would return his love. A year later, Crimson accepted Arthur's proposal. Many years later, they got married and had a happy family.

Scenario C: Arthur is a close friend to Ben. One day, Arthur told Ben that he loved a girl named Crimson. Ben did not say much and congratulated Arthur on falling in love. Many months later, Arthur was sad and he told Ben that he did everything he could and for Crimson eagerly showed his love to Crimson but she did not reciprocate his love. Ben advised Arthur against pursuing his love and told him to look at it rationally. Many years later, Ben received Arthur invitation to his wedding with Crimson. Attending the wedding, Ben still did not understand how Arthur and Crimson got together, and Arthur did not mention that either.

Scenario D: Arthur is a close friend to Ben. One day, Arthur told Ben that he loved a girl named Crimson. Ben did not say much and congratulated Arthur on falling in love. Many months later, Arthur was sad and he told Ben that he did everything he could and for Crimson eagerly showed his love to Crimson but she did not reciprocate his love. Ben advised Arthur against giving up on his love and told him that one day she would return his love. Some years later, Arthur and Crimson broke up. Ben did not understand why Crimson could turn down a nice guy like Arthur, nor did he know the reason for their breakup.

Among these scenarios above, in which scenario that Arthur behaved irrationally? Is love something that strips people of rationality? Or is it something that grants people a different set of rationality?

When I say that I like this flower because I like this flower, it appears that I still do not get rid of the element of rationality. Instead of showing how this flower is different from other flowers or how liking this flower could benefit me, I choose to use personal preference as an explanation for my liking the flower. I do not eliminate rationality, I just simply replace one set of rationality with another set of rationality. And even if I say that I don't know why I like this flower, I am still not denying that this is a rationality for my liking the flower, I am just claiming that the rationality is unbeknownst to me.

Back to the question from the beginning, is love irrational? Is love something that cannot be understood, or is it something that requires a different set of rationality (different from the common logic) to be understood? Seeing through Arthur's point of view, did he really think that what he was doing for Crimson was irrational? Which set of rationality was he referring to?

November 2023, Singapore.

Share this post: Facebook Twitter

Discover Other Blogs

In Philosophy of Arts class, I have been taught two major schools of thought regarding interpretation of arts – hypothetical intentionalism (interpretation of arts is based on what is written in the text alongside other literature-relevant evidence such as the theme of the authors’ previous works) and modest actual intentionalism (interpretation of arts is based on what the author says they want to convey, but such has to be supported by what is written in the text). It seems to me that hypothetical intentionalism and modest actual intentionalism rely on textual evidence, alongside other literature-relevant evidence, to interpret a work of art. The extent to which each evidence plays in the interpretation of a work of art varies depending on the school of thought. I just wonder whether such an approach would do justice to the author, as language may not fully convey what the author wants to express. Let me clarify my point.

Read more →

I had the wonderful opportunity to embark on a Global Experience (GEx) study trip to Bandung and Yogyakarta, Indonesia, with a professor and fellow students from NUS College. The study trip spanned one month (half a month in each city) and comprised visits to houses and studios of prominent local artists, hikes to notable landmarks of the areas, a street art biking tour, student consultations, and student-initiated trips. I was attracted to this study trip by the theme of creative city development. I have always been fascinated by the arts and the question of how we can use the arts to address the social problems in the city. That is a question that has intrigued me for a very long time, long before the trip. Whenever I read a book or observed a painting, I have always wondered if the arts can be more than a medium for self-expression. What if the arts were used as a form of non-verbal language to discuss and dissect social problems?

Read more →
October 18, 2023

Blue - King of Swords With rationality, you purge through the mist-of uncertainty. Weaving a sword, you snip off the knots you-cannot uncoil. You want to build a world out of pure reason. Little do you know, The world's on fire - yet - your wish's-unaltered. Have you ever wept for a withering flower?

Read more →